Re: I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?
From: stephan beal (stephan_at_wanderinghorse.net)
Date: 10/24/03
- Next message: stephan beal: "Re: suse 9.0 pro-upgrade - off backorder"
- Previous message: Randall Wilkinson: "Re: SuSE 8.2 / KDE 3.1.4 sound lost - Solved: VMWare did it"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Preston Crawford: "I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Next in thread: Philip Thompson: "Re: I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Reply: Philip Thompson: "Re: I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:26:11 +0200
Preston Crawford wrote:
> I was reading a review the other day that came out and a couple of things
> stuck out to me. Number one, the review said that SuSE 9 came with Gnome
> 2.2. That's definitely a negative. Too soon for the new kernel and
i won't go into details, but here's my 0.02 Euro:
Stick with 8.2. There's not (much) which is really annoying about 9.0 (a few
minor annoyances and installation omissions), but in general i was
marginally happier with 8.1 and 8.2.
That said, upgrade fever is always too tempting. :/
...
> wanto make a system change. I might stick with 8.2. Is there anything
> about 9 that I'm not aware of, that would make me change my mind?
If you're an avid Yast user, suse 9.0 has a much improved yast - the console
version is easier to navigate (IMO) and the X version has lots of new
entries.
Also, if you're an Office user, it appears that OpenOffice has improved
considerably since it's days as StarOffice. (i haven't used it much,
though, so i can't give specifics.)
If you're a developer, the error-highlighting features included in gcc 3.3.1
(suse 9) are really helpful...
Well, okay, maybe the upgrade to 9 isn't such a bad idea after all. The only
things which i consider "broken" since my upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0 are
relatively minor (terminal handling in konsole, e.g., i cannot run 'mc'
from Solaris boxes using konsole anymore, but can from xterm).
-- ----- stephan beal Registered Linux User #71917 http://counter.li.org I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
- Next message: stephan beal: "Re: suse 9.0 pro-upgrade - off backorder"
- Previous message: Randall Wilkinson: "Re: SuSE 8.2 / KDE 3.1.4 sound lost - Solved: VMWare did it"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Preston Crawford: "I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Next in thread: Philip Thompson: "Re: I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Reply: Philip Thompson: "Re: I might not upgrade to 9, any reason I should?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|