Re: SuSE 9 boot time
From: Kevin Nathan (knathan_at_project54.com)
Date: 11/08/03
- Next message: baskitcaise: "Re: Linux' future at the desktop"
- Previous message: baskitcaise: "Re: Does Suse have something like Up2date in RedHat"
- In reply to: mark: "SuSE 9 boot time"
- Next in thread: mark: "Re: SuSE 9 boot time"
- Reply: mark: "Re: SuSE 9 boot time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 00:57:36 -0700
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 06:28:45 GMT
mark <mark2741NOSPAM@verizon.net> wrote:
> would it be worth it to
> upgrade to SuSE 9? Looking over the enhancement list on the site it
> seems the only real enhancement that I'd be interested in would be
> the faster boot time.
That depends; if you reboot several times per day, it may make a
difference, but if you reboot only every few months (or longer),
who cares how long the boot takes? :-)
-- Kevin Nathan (Montana, USA) Open standards. Open source. Open minds. The command line is the front line. Linux 2.4.10-4GB 12:56am up 29 days, 5:08, 5 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.03
- Next message: baskitcaise: "Re: Linux' future at the desktop"
- Previous message: baskitcaise: "Re: Does Suse have something like Up2date in RedHat"
- In reply to: mark: "SuSE 9 boot time"
- Next in thread: mark: "Re: SuSE 9 boot time"
- Reply: mark: "Re: SuSE 9 boot time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
