Re: Flintstone Linux.
From: The Ghost In The Machine (ewill_at_sirius.athghost7038suus.net)
Date: 12/03/03
- Next message: mjt: "Re: kmail font size"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- In reply to: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Next in thread: TehGhodTrole: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Reply: TehGhodTrole: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:00:16 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Kadaitcha Man
<nospam@rainx.cjb.net>
wrote
on Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:10:11 -0800 (PST)
<QPl0sHfDvisw0B4324E7zjnQYSypWzyc@win.wwiinn.com>:
> Nate McSorley wrote:
>
>> It crawls along on an Abit Pentium 3 gigahurtz board with 2g of DDR
>> dual channel ram.
>> I am using SUSE 9.0 as if it matters at all because Redhat sucked even
>> more.
>
> I am using Mandrake 9.1 on a dual 2.8GHz Xeon system with 2GB of registered
> dual channel DDR and it runs, well, not quite like treacle on a cold day,
> but it is far from snappy. I put it down to linux perpetually computing
> uptime so the linuxfux have something to brag about.
>
Why not put WinXP Professional or Server on that system
so that it'll zip along and do what you want, then?
Is there a reason you need Linux on that box?
-- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless.
- Next message: mjt: "Re: kmail font size"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- In reply to: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Next in thread: TehGhodTrole: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Reply: TehGhodTrole: "Re: Flintstone Linux."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|