Re: Open office vs Staroffice
From: Chris Cox (ccox_nopenotthis_at_airmail.net)
Date: 01/15/04
- Next message: Chris Cox: "Re: SUSE 9 success on Dual Athlon with HW Raid"
- Previous message: grilla: "kde 3.2 beta install"
- In reply to: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Next in thread: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Reply: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:46:10 -0600
Drew Cutter wrote:
> If I understand crossover I don't need to buy MS Office in addition to
> crossover software ? I got the impression that with crossover that act
> like vmware or am i wrong ?
>
Crossover requires that you HAVE a copy of MS Office to install.
IMHO, Office 2000 is a good choice... though I've used Office 97
and Office XP as well with Crossover Office. I prefer
Office 2000, because Office XP "phone home" much like the
XP OS does... and Office 97 still has a few quirks... especially
if you just have to run Outlook (which I don't recommend, but
the Office 2000 one does seem to work well).
- Next message: Chris Cox: "Re: SUSE 9 success on Dual Athlon with HW Raid"
- Previous message: grilla: "kde 3.2 beta install"
- In reply to: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Next in thread: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Reply: Drew Cutter: "Re: Open office vs Staroffice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|