Re: SATA/PATA drives
From: Hendric Stattmann (DELETETHIShendric.stattmann_at_bluewin.ch)
Date: 01/26/04
- Next message: Jay: "Re: Hauppauge's Win TV-Radio"
- Previous message: Mathew Snyder: "Re: Coupla questions"
- In reply to: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "SATA/PATA drives"
- Next in thread: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "Re: SATA/PATA drives"
- Reply: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "Re: SATA/PATA drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:25:51 +0100
Kevin & Theresa Miller wrote:
> My question is, how does the performance of a SATA drive w/DMA off compare
> with
> a PATA (normal IDE) drive? SATA with DMA should be quite a bit faster of
> course, but I'm not sure how to compare the DMA crippled SATA Barracuda
> with the PATA Barracuda (or similar drive).
Hi Kevin,
The non-DMA access of SATA drives is a kernel 2.4 issue. The patch applied
by SuSE does not support DMA. Your solution consists in upgrading to kernel
2.6, which is not trivial, unfortunately.
Regards Hendric
-- Hendric Stattmann, Lausanne, Switzerland. Registered Linux User #178879 The official Swiss Shodokan Aikido Homepage: http://www.shodokan.ch
- Next message: Jay: "Re: Hauppauge's Win TV-Radio"
- Previous message: Mathew Snyder: "Re: Coupla questions"
- In reply to: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "SATA/PATA drives"
- Next in thread: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "Re: SATA/PATA drives"
- Reply: Kevin & Theresa Miller: "Re: SATA/PATA drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|