Re: Linux is a waste of time. It sucks!

From: alw-ian-*** (marqvs_at_LinuxNow.gag)
Date: 03/31/04 

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:34:03 -0800

joseph philip wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:01:06 +0100, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>> joseph philip wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:50:47 -0800, Ishtar Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've tried suse and mandrake and wasted my weekend trying to make
>>>> them work on my AMD system with an Asus mamboard.Sound didn't work
>>>> my on board ethernet didn't work and I couldn't get the raid system
>>>> to work either.My ATI 9600 All in Wonder board did not work
>>>> correctly and gave me static from the outputs.
>>>> How can anyone with 1/4 of a brain cell say that linux is better
>>>> than windows? Windows XP installed perfectly on my computer and
>>>> everything worked including the camera and scanner and my lexmark
>>>> z65 printer which linux seems to not work with as well. Linux is a
>>>> huge failure and I would never suggest it to anyone unless i truly
>>>> hated them and wanted to see them suffer. Ishtar Singh
>>>
>>> Well then Mr. Singh, I guess linux is not for you. Excuse me while I
>>> go use my low end computer and do far more with it than that
>>> quad-Xeon you have XP on.
>>
>> I have one of those - See...
>>
>> I'd be interested for you to enlighten me as to what you can do with
>> your boat anchor, that I cannot do with my Ferrari. Or are you just
>> yet another loudmouthed fuckwit who hasn't got the goods?
>
> HAHAHA!!! You actually gave your money to INTEL after they pulled that
> 2.2V P!!! overclocking stunt? And the P4 nonsense in 2000?
>
> As to my boat anchor, I can be quite rough with it, and force it to
> do all sorts of things simultaneously. Ever since I've used linux,
> I've never made a coaster, never mind that something else is always
> going on. Suffice it to say that when I use it, the hard disks, the
> dvdrom, the cdrw and the network interfaces are going at full tilt,
> and the cpu's close to a 100%
>
> I can use my system *more efficiently* than you. That means, "doing
> more with less"; something XP is not very bothered about. It knows
> you're going to feed it a few processors and lots and lots of ram, so
> why bother with a little thing like efficiency, huh?
>
>
> It's not the car. It's the driver, stupid!!

You're trolling, aren't you.

I thought so, no one could possibly be dumb enough to post that for real.

Quantcast