Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1
From: pioe[rmv] (_at_coldsiberia.org)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: pioe[rmv]: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: Just pre-ordered SuSE 9.1 Pro"
- In reply to: Ulf: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Next in thread: David LOney: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 13:23:43 +0200
Ulf wrote:
> Good comment CJP.
> I agree with you, there are pro and con's with both ways of posting.
> However, my problem is the harassing of people claiming that the only
> allowed reply method is a bottom-post. And, to further enforce that they
> threat with not reading nor answering top-posts.
I am new to this discussion.
How do you expect me to see the context easily if you and everyone
else place the answer /before/ what is being replied to?
That is just not logical. The answer must come /after/ the question.
Per Inge Oestmoen, Norway
- Next message: pioe[rmv]: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: Just pre-ordered SuSE 9.1 Pro"
- In reply to: Ulf: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Next in thread: David LOney: "Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
