Re: Suse 9.0 or 9.1

From: Ulf (ulf.xxx_at_ericsson.com)
Date: 05/06/04 

Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 09:28:00 +0200

So, we are down to bad language Peter?
I guess you have to resort to that, since you don't have any relevant facts
that can make me rethink my position.

I'm part of this newsgroup (Ha!) I'm questioning the rationale for this
fanatic law that anything not posted at teh bottom of a post is not worthy a
reply.
I'm part of several newsgroups, very few of them have a bottom-post policy,
nor any discussions on it.

So flame on, Peter, you are digging your own .... here.

"Peter Köhlmann" <Peter.Koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:c7a6bd$qb2$01$1@news.t-online.com...
>
> Read RFC 1855, you top-posting twit
>
> And it has nothing to do with "allowed". It has everything to do with what
a
> newsgroup decides. If the vast majority thinks that inline-posting should
> be the norm (as it should be), you can act like a stupid *** (just
like
> you do) and disregard this. And get flamed for this behaviour. Rightly so
>