Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs
From: Kevin Nathan (knathan_at_project54.com)
Date: 05/23/04
- Next message: Anton Marais: "Re: Wvdial: Segmentation fault after installing modem with 'Intel 536ep chipset'."
- Previous message: Paulo Rocha: "Re: Modem Intel 537 NOTEBOOK"
- In reply to: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Next in thread: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Reply: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:01:19 -0600
On Sun, 23 May 2004 16:51:37 +0200
fabrice <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
> nobody can help ?
Sorry, I can't. But I have one suggestion: what happens if you update
the 9.0 box to 9.1? Does it's NFS then work properly? If that's not an
option at this point, maybe see if this page gives you any help or clues
where to look:
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2002-02/msg00115.html
-- Kevin Nathan (Montana, USA) Open standards. Open source. Open minds. The command line is the front line. Linux 2.4.20-4GB-athlon 10:43am up 11:08, 9 users, load average: 0.07, 0.06, 0.01
- Next message: Anton Marais: "Re: Wvdial: Segmentation fault after installing modem with 'Intel 536ep chipset'."
- Previous message: Paulo Rocha: "Re: Modem Intel 537 NOTEBOOK"
- In reply to: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Next in thread: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Reply: fabrice: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|