Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs
From: fabrice (nospam_at_nospam.net)
Date: 05/23/04
- Next message: Dennis J. Tuchler: "Where to get info"
- Previous message: Kevin Nathan: "Re: extreme arrogance"
- In reply to: Kevin Nathan: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:49:07 +0200
Kevin Nathan wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 16:51:37 +0200
> fabrice <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>nobody can help ?
>
>
> Sorry, I can't. But I have one suggestion: what happens if you update
> the 9.0 box to 9.1? Does it's NFS then work properly? If that's not an
> option at this point, maybe see if this page gives you any help or clues
> where to look:
>
> http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2002-02/msg00115.html
>
>
With a 9.1 client, the nfs-shared utf8 encoded filesystem works perfectly.
But I'm not ready to upgrade my 9.0 box now (too much customisation, and
it works perfectly).
Anyway, thanks for the pointer. While reading this list, it seems that
I18N and filenames is a complex problem...(maybe not fully solved yet).
Thanks again,
fabrice
ps: anybody knows if nfs in suse91 is V3 or V4 ?
- Next message: Dennis J. Tuchler: "Where to get info"
- Previous message: Kevin Nathan: "Re: extreme arrogance"
- In reply to: Kevin Nathan: "Re: suse91 and 90: utf8, samba and nfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
