Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?
From: Floyd L. Davidson (floyd_at_barrow.com)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Previous message: Marko Ramius: "Re: Fileserver question"
- In reply to: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Next in thread: relic: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Reply: relic: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Reply: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:08:06 -0800
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
>Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> And here we have again some dimwit not having understood the GPL
>> And the meaning of "free" in connection with OSS
>
>That would be someone else because I know for a fact that the OSS refers to
>free as in speech, not free as in sausages.
"Linux is supposed to be free, so any sale that involves linux
is gross."
Your statement, which you continue to defend. You don't seem to have
a clue what any of this means.
-- FloydL. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com
- Next message: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Previous message: Marko Ramius: "Re: Fileserver question"
- In reply to: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Next in thread: relic: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Reply: relic: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Reply: Kadaitcha Man: "Re: Does IBM REALLY support Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|