Re: test

From: Robert Hull (Robert_at_please.do-not-spam.me.uk)
Date: 10/03/04 

Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 13:27:56 +0100

In message <z9ednZ8lboVkisLcRVn-oQ@rogers.com>, spambuster
<hakjunk@rogers.com> wrote
>test

Please be wary of replying to the original article, this does not appear
to come from a clueless newbie, it is probably an attempt by a spammer
to harvest valid addresses from people sending a personal reply to the
collection address set in the Reply-To: header of the original post. 

-- 
Robert          Talking to yourself - first sign of madness
                 Answering yourself back - first sign of schizophrenia
                 I go one better: If I don't like the answer ...
                 I put it to a majority vote

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Patricks current greatest hit
    ... Geezus people can ya delete the original article from your replies unless ... you are replying to something specific in the original post? ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: Patricks current greatest hit
    ... Geezus people can ya delete the original article from your replies unless ... you are replying to something specific in the original post? ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: what do the values of "clocks ticks" and "CLOCK_PER_SEC" represent?
    ... You really need to include context when you post. ... My news server has expired the original article to which you are replying. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Patricks current greatest hit
    ... Geezus people can ya delete the original article from your replies unless ... you are replying to something specific in the original post? ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)