Re: Is Linux Really Deserving of so much FUD?
From: Me (me_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Schraalhans Keukenmeester: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Previous message: muncher: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- In reply to: Warren Harding: "Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Next in thread: Schraalhans Keukenmeester: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:21:52 GMT
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:04:52 -0500, Warren Harding wrote:
> I've tried both Suse 9.2 and Mandrake 10.1 this weekend on a Dell computer
> and I can confirm that while both of them installed fine they suck beyond
> belief when I used them.
> How anyone can compare:
> k3b to nero.
> Openoffice to MSOffice.
> gnucash to quicken
> audacity to Wavelab
>
> anything Linux to anything Windows is far beyond my reasoning.
>
> These Linux applications stink beyond belief and some are so bad you can't
> even keep them running for more than a couple of minutes without locking
> up the entire computer.
> And this is supposed to be better than Windows? No way!
If this is the best you can come up with please knock if off.
Its just pathetic how transparent you are Flatfart.
You're not even a good troll.
- Next message: Schraalhans Keukenmeester: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Previous message: muncher: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- In reply to: Warren Harding: "Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Next in thread: Schraalhans Keukenmeester: "Re: Is Linux Really That Bad? Yes It IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
