Re: Second Best Linux?

From: Dave Clarke (pinggetridofthisbituino_at_operamail.com)
Date: 01/28/05 

Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:19:58 +0000

On Friday 28 January 2005 14:05 Werner wrote:

>
>
> Whitey Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:43:05 +0000, tssdns wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>BTW to the OP, if you've decided that SuSE is best, why settle for
>>>second best? It's not as if second best is always cheaper to acquire.
>>>:-)
>>
>>
>> I think that he was assuming that everyone in SuSE group would say SuSE
>> is the best so it was diplomatic way of asking for other suggestions of
>> flavors.
>
> I think the way the OP put the question was extremely smart. He would do
> the same on a Gentoo and Fedora and (any distro here) newsgroup.
>
> It reminds me of this old riddle: there was a fork in the road and the
> traveller did not know whether to go left or right was best to reach his
> destination.
>
> In the house nearby lived identical looking twin brothers who both knew
> the answer. Trouble was: everybody knew that one of them was always
> telling the truth and the other would always lie.
>
> So what question would the traveller ask?

Ooooo,
<waves around hand in the air>
Sir, sir me sir. I know this one sir. 

-- 
Dave Clarke