Re: Question about YAST
From: Kevin Nathan (knathan_at_project54.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Andrew: "Re: KDE Screen shot"
- Previous message: Kevin Nathan: "Re: knotes executable file lost"
- In reply to: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Next in thread: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Reply: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:11:36 -0700
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:36:38 -0600
mjt <mjtobler@removethis_mail.ru> wrote:
> let me be a bit clearer - if the yast-approved newer version
> of some package (newer than on the CD/DVD), then the text
> will NOT be in red. but if the package is newer and not in
> the yast meta repository, it WILL be in red. it's a sort
> of, "HEY, you've got some newer software installed that
> official SUSE doesnt know about"
Basically, that's what I meant. For instance, my installation source is
SUSE's FTP site for 9.2 and if I install a newer version than the
'official' 9.2 version, it's in red, regardless of whether install
source is CD/DVD/FTP. I wasn't thinking in terms of a 'meta-repository'
for YaST, but that makes sense. Do they really have that, or do they
just go by what's on the install source?
-- Kevin Nathan (Arizona, USA) Linux Potpourri and a.o.l.s. FAQ -- http://www.project54.com/linux/ Open standards. Open source. Open minds. The command line is the front line. Linux 2.6.8-24.11-default 8:08pm up 8 days 8:04, 9 users, load average: 0.39, 0.37, 0.44
- Next message: Andrew: "Re: KDE Screen shot"
- Previous message: Kevin Nathan: "Re: knotes executable file lost"
- In reply to: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Next in thread: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Reply: mjt: "Re: Question about YAST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
