Re: Install Firefox questions

From: b_baka (bbaka_at_syix.com)
Date: 03/10/05


Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:42:24 -0800

Sven Burmeister wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jan wrote:
>
>>Would it be more logical for me to wait until next week, when I have the
>> 40 GB hard drive that I ordered, and load the full Suse 7.3 before
>>trying again, or is there a simple step to solve the missing
>>dependencies situation?
>
>
> To be honest, there should be no missing dependencies, so either you confuse
> the version of your SuSE, or you should switch to a recent version. You
> will not find packages for very old versions such as 7.3.
>
> I would recommend to you that you wait for your harddisk and install SuSE
> 9.2 which is freely available and saves you a lot of hussle when installing
> software packages. Basically it would be a click and go with SuSE 9.2, so
> why do you want SuSE 7.3? Apart from that KDE has improved a lot and its
> usabilty is not compareabel to the version coming with 7.3.
>
> You can get 9.2 via ftp-installation, or d/l the DVD and burn it. Make sure
> to read the READMEs in that directory, although one of them is in German,
> the commands to type should be obvious. You need them to melt the split
> DVD-ISO back to one file.
>
> ftp://ftp.skynet.be/mirror/suse.com/92-iso-split
>
> Sven

OK, I too have had my share of problems here. I downloaded using Windows
XP since I was on it at the time, then burned it (Firefox and
Thunderbird) plus the new version of Open Office to a CD. Thunderbird
was easy but both Firefox and Open Office are giving me a lot of grief.
I start out with the tar.gz and can gunzip OK but after that I can't
seem to get anywhere with the tar files, even after going command line.
And yes I am effectively a newbie since the last time I was playing with
LINUX was in 1996 when I had a triple boot system (DOS, LINUX, and
OS/2). The frigging Windows 95 CD decided it was going to run scan disk
and repair the 'corrupted' MBR and files without even asking my
permission. I stopped it as soon as I saw what was going on but even
after a few minutes (bathroom break due to coffee) it was way too late.
I have hated Microsoft and all things Windows or Redmond ever since. The
only reason I use it at all is because the weenies at work insist on it.
I never crashed DOS except once intentionally, LINUX was stable even
back then, and I loved OS/2.
Back on topic, how does one get these things to install? Since it is my
machine I can log on as root superuser and still not get it to work?
It is an AMD XP clocked at 1150MHz so it is probably a 1300+ by their
standards, 390 MB ram, an MSI KT4V mother board, plain old dial up modem
(I live 500 feet to far for DSL) and a sound blaster. I doubt that the
system has anything to do with it but it may be the LINUX distros I am
using, courtesy if IBM. I received free both the SUSE enterprise server
complete with 4 CD-ROM disks, and days later a new Novell LINUX Desktop.
I installed each on its very own drives 13GB and 20GB and the came up
just fine. I am happy so far but installing new software is a bit tough.
Any comments, please?

BTW, now I need another drive to put my old Red Hat onto. This is the
beauty of having a bios that allows you to hit f11 and boot from any
disk in the system. I think it is Award but I never pay attention to
that since I am waiting to hit the f11 key. I already have too many
drives, DOS, LINUX (Red Hat, IBM server, IBM office), Windows 2000 Pro,
and Windows XP. I learned the hard way not to put too much on one disk
and do a multi-boot from a fixed C: DOS. It used to go to LILO and ask
me where to go, then if I hit DOS it would take me into Windows 2000
boot manager where I could pick a version of windows or just plain DOS.
Unfortunately IBM and GRUB had different ideas. Only my DOS was lost but
I am still trying to recover that, mostly for games (about 100) for my
granddaughter.
I think I may have just over posted.
Bill Baka

P.S. Anybody with any good advice can reach me at bbaka@syix.com, the
underbar was just to defeat some spam since I get about 100 every day.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: eMachines OEM XP woes - time to buy $tandard?
    ... >>> under Windoze. ... Let's say one wants to install NVU. ... Now show how much easier it is to install MS Office on Linux than ... Windows OS's from Win3.1 to Windows 2003 Server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: bad experience with Suse 9.1 on Inspiron 8200
    ... > it is an M$ bug, such technicalities are irrelevant to the end user. ... :-) Windows has ... work as long as they work, trying to install a nitrous ... Linux are at least a *little* bit curious about how their computer works ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Subject: Re: Linux sucks?
    ... > the applications I run in my field do not run on Linux. ... I have cygwin on Windows ... so Windows users only hit this rarely at install. ... XP users hit this when they add hardware and the 'automatic ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Linux, the final decision
    ... >> how Windows deals with an analogous situation. ... > That drivers have access to the gui is not a hard and fast rule. ... >> Unreal engines can run under Linux. ... no one has to install Windows because the ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Linux hates windows
    ... Linux, the underlying philosphy stays pretty stable and lessons you ... Install VMWare (I haven't ... a complete virtual computer, into Windows, in a window on your Linux ... > pretty much rely on books, ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)