Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?
From: Ann (nntpmail_at_epix.net)
Date: 04/08/05
- Next message: Thong_floss: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Previous message: Perfect Reign: "Re: Kernel versioning madness?"
- In reply to: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Next in thread: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Reply: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:03:53 GMT
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:48:46 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:11:39 +0000, Ann wrote:
>
> [snips]
>>
>> Yes, there is a lot of "free" software for linux, but there is no
>> guarantee that it's going to work with your hardware. (No guarantee
>> with Windows either but it's more likely.)
>>
> Nonsense. The vast majority of Linux software will work on any hardware
> without problems because all it requires is a functioning Linux
> installation. Why would compilers/mail clients/databases/office
> suites/browsers/etc. etc. care what flavour the sound card is?
The software doesn't "care", assuming it correctly detects failure, but
the user might if the printer, scanner, sound chip, modem, etc doesn't
work.
> Remind me; how many CPUs and different hardware platforms can Windows be
> compiled for/expected to run on?
- Next message: Thong_floss: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Previous message: Perfect Reign: "Re: Kernel versioning madness?"
- In reply to: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Next in thread: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Reply: Brian: "Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|