Re: Windows Server/Suse 9.2

From: Matt Nosy Canalegrande (canalegrande_at_myway.com)
Date: 04/09/05


Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:49:08 GMT

On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:53:14 +0000 coughed Charlie:

>
> I know nothing about setting up a server. That is why I want to do it.
> I have a spare computer and I can download an evaluation copy of Windows
> Server 2003. I want to use that program to learn about it, I can use it
> for free for 6 months. Also I dont know much about how servers work and
> I am way better at Windows than Linux.
> All I propose to do is set it up as a print server and to share
> photographs and music with the other computers in my house so the rest
> of my family can use them, I also want to play with the permissions.
> Actually they already can share by putting the files in my shared folder
> or to map a shared drive but I want to go the server route.
> Now the question. I have a three XP Pro and 1 XP home machines and one
> SUSE 9.2 machine (actually a dual boot with XP Pro).
> I know Windows does not like to see Linux partitions but is it possible
> to have Windows server work with it as well so I can share the photos
> and music with my Linux box.
> Once I can learn enough about servers my evaluation time period will
> have run out and then I will try to make the server Linux.
> Any suggestions or information would be welcome.
>
> Thanks
> Charlie

To do both is maybe not the best of all ideas. I started with windows 1.0
until XP. There is nothing compared with Linux on the server side and even
on desktop I am using KDE / Gnome with increasing enthusiasm. Just
imagine, starting the "Explorer" pendant Konqueror and typing camera:/ to
access your camera and see pictures like on any other drive! There are so
many examples about the cleverness, stability and many more things: I
touch XP less and less. (playing Gothic 2)

But again: servers are different.
A collegue of mine got a seminar paid for Windows Server 2003. It took 6
weeks and he told me that in the end NOTHING was working as it should. The
cost of the seminar was 3000 Euros and the trainer said, that this can
happen. He meant that it was sufficient to understand the idea ...

Although I don't consider myself as an expet at all, I set up a
SuSE 9.2 Linux server, SAMBA (for the WINDOWS boxes), DHCP, Apache with
some modules, mysql and after 3 hours, the whole thing was running without
a flaw, all new updates over internet included. Of course it will take
more adjustments for the special situation everybody is facing. Er,
evaluation? Gneeheehee.
License for 5 boxes? rofl.

so?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Future of IT in Lebanon
    ... It's the same Linux code base. ... Microsoft Office on a Windows server, it will install and run fine, the main ...
    (soc.culture.lebanon)
  • Re: Question about Red Hat Linux Enterprise
    ... we have is running Windows 2000 Server ... Luckily running Apache + MySQL on a Linux system is not a lot ... MySQL database and injecting it back into the MySQL installation ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Sweet Success
    ... Let's continue to assume that I prefer Windows to anything else: ... neither Linux nor Windows may be the answer. ... While it may well be initially less expensive to install a Linux-based ... of Linux simultaneously, along with Windows Server, AIX, and OS/400. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] 70 million computers are using Windows 98 right now
    ... Linux is definitely not a natural migration pathway. ... Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Mac OS X seem to work pretty ... > desktop to server. ... But then the persons across the sea just can't install ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Benutzerkontenverwaltung mit Win 2003 Server - Teil 2
    ... und dann bin ich über Solaris zur ersten 30-Disketten-Version Linux ... Server auch keine grafische Oberfläche, der vi ist halt mein bester ... Und das ganze geht schon in Ansätzen seit Windows NT so ... > Unternehmensnetzwerk unter Unix administrieren könnte. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.windows.server.networking)