Re: Linux Market share?
From: TokaMundo (TokaMundo_at_weedizgood.org)
Date: 07/12/05
- Next message: David Wilson Clarke: "Re: Package Protection in Yast"
- Previous message: sree: "Re: SSH connection issue"
- In reply to: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Next in thread: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Reply: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:09:34 GMT
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:57:46 GMT, "billwg" <billw@twcf.rr.com> Gave
us:
> Apple was excluded
>then because it was not Intel compatible and Linux was excluded because it
>was a server product.
What? Linux was initially a server product, and has garnered
INTEREST as a desktop OS, and has slowly evolved toward that end.
It has always been a server OS.
> Given that definition, Microsoft has 100% of the
>market or very close to it,
Do you even know how many Linux servers are in operation out there?
Millions.
> since today there clearly is some linux aimed at
>desktops and some money has changed hands on that basis.
OK... so now, you are saying that it was a server OS... Ummm make
up yer mind...
- Next message: David Wilson Clarke: "Re: Package Protection in Yast"
- Previous message: sree: "Re: SSH connection issue"
- In reply to: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Next in thread: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Reply: billwg: "Re: Linux Market share?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
