fat32/NTFS which order?
From: Andrew (eagle_at_charter.net)
Date: 07/12/05
- Next message: John Bailo: "Re: no sound after update to 9.3"
- Previous message: JM Remacle: "Re: 9.3 : no more graphical interface"
- Next in thread: Michael Zerr: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: Michael Zerr: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: *** Voorthuis: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: ray: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:23:35 -0500
In a couple of days I am going to be resetting up my computer. I am
going to have 2 hard drives. A 120 gig drive and a 10 gig.
The 10 gig will have suse linux (probably 9.3)
and the 120 will be NTFS and Fat32, the NTFS will be 105 gigs in size
and have xp home edition installed and I'll have a 15 gig partition
(fat32 type) for moving files from linux to windows and back again.
For the 120 gig drive, should I partition it so that the NTFS file
system is first or the 15 gig Fat32 is 1st? Or does it even matter?
Also which hard drive should be first, the 120 gig (with windows) or the
10 gig drive with linux? By first I mean the primary hard drive on the
primary IDE cable. And more importantly, which which way is easier?
- Next message: John Bailo: "Re: no sound after update to 9.3"
- Previous message: JM Remacle: "Re: 9.3 : no more graphical interface"
- Next in thread: Michael Zerr: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: Michael Zerr: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: *** Voorthuis: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Reply: ray: "Re: fat32/NTFS which order?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]