Re: Dual NICs, Routing Problem

Here is the output from a few commands that I should have posted in the
original post:


# ifconfig
# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:22:17:AB:C9
inet addr:192.1.36.11 Bcast:192.1.36.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:22ff:fe17:abc9/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1128 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:640 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:125532 (122.5 Kb) TX bytes:64054 (62.5 Kb)
Base address:0xecc0 Memory:fe5e0000-fe600000

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:22:17:AB:CA
inet addr:192.1.34.205 Bcast:192.1.34.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:22ff:fe17:abca/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3509 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2982 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:330012 (322.2 Kb) TX bytes:922991 (901.3 Kb)
Base address:0xdcc0 Memory:fe3e0000-fe400000

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:548 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:548 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:114833 (112.1 Kb) TX bytes:114833 (112.1 Kb)



# routing table
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.1.36.0 192.1.36.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
192.1.34.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 192.1.34.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth1



# routes file
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network/routes
192.1.36.0 192.1.36.1 255.255.255.0 eth-id-00:14:22:17:ab:c9
default 192.1.34.254 - -



Let me know if there are any others you'd be interested in.

-Tom

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Network Puzzle with 2 NICs
    ... Is that Your routing table? ... into that 192.168.0/24 subnet will be sent via eth1. ... So if one route matches the target, ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • two nics to one lan
    ... Whatever happened caused the eth1 route to be non-functional, ... but all traffic bound to 172.16.59.0/24 was being routed through eth1. ... Unfortunately I don't have the routing table from then, ... was down) there was one well-configured route via eth0 for that subnet. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: [opensuse] Network settings
    ... I would use only ifconfig and route. ... Quite frankly the number of times I've needed to look at the routing ... Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org ...
    (SuSE)
  • RE: More help needed please
    ... I don't know why there is no traffic on eth1 - I think that is the ... I did remove the bad route as requested. ... routing table leading me to claim that it may be a bug. ... Both nics are set to come up at boot time. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: [SLE] Routing problem
    ... On Wednesday 20 October 2004 17:07, jim barnes wrote: ... > For what you are trying to do your routing table will suffice. ... > The output of ifconfig and route from both machines could be helpful also. ...
    (SuSE)