Re: sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- From: Robert Hull <Robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:35:06 +0000
In alt.os.linux.suse, on Sun 19 February 2006 14:35, gp <gpass@xxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks Malke. Beleive me that the reason exists,
Reason for *what* - without quoting the question, your reply becomes
nonsense.
not for all but for
those using software for profession and might have more than one
installation to deal with. It is much productive and secure to use
same versions to all of them, for any software package used. But is it
reasonable and practical for anyone to upgrade many installations or
even his own one, every time producers come up with a new version?
If you are referring to *releases* of SUSE Linux - as the subject
suggests you might be - then those who are using Linux professionally
for multiple installations - as you hint above - should choose SUSE
Linux Enterprise Server to get the sort of long-term support that you
appear to be talking about.
Of course, it would be much easier to make constructive comments if your
article made any sense, but since you chose not to quote what you were
talking about, I have had to guess.
--
Robert HULL
Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net
is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- From: gp
- Re: sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- From: Malke
- Re: sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- From: gp
- sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- Prev by Date: Re: New 10 install, 1 update fails...
- Next by Date: Re: why does yast now require the dante package for configuring mail?
- Previous by thread: Re: sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- Next by thread: Re: sata hd works with 8.1 but not in 8.2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
