Re: Minimal 10.0 installation



On 16 Mar 2006 09:06:19 -0800, Rick DeBay <Rick_member@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <f48ne3-iu9.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, houghi says...

Rick DeBay wrote:
How would I go about creating a minimal 10.0 installation for a server? Since
SLES 10 is supposed to be very close to the current Suse 10.0, we're using 10.0
for evaluation and test.
The only problem is that it's configured to install the kitchen sink, and trying
to remove most of the products and libraries always ends up a dependancy
nightmare.
Has anyone done this before, and what was your approach?

Depends on what you call minimal. During setup instead of choosing Gnome
or KDE, pick the third choice. Otherwise you could look at
http://en.opensuse.org/1_CD_Install on how to make your own 1 CD
version.

By minimal I mean losing the games, bluetooth, office tools, GIMP, chat, etc, as
well as their associated libraries. I also wouldn't mind losing CUPS and other
print programs and libraries.

The only stuff that's required is adminstration and security programs and
libraries, and Gnome so a Windows admin can perform tasks if there is a problem
and no Linux admin around.

Thanks, Rick DeBay

Rick;

IIRC - once you've booted from the SUSE 10.0 distro and answer the
initial prompts you are presented with a summary screen where you are
asked to accept and click on Finish to install. At that point you
would click on the Programs section OR on the CONFIGURE button and
select Programs, then scroll through ALL of the selections and UNCHECK
all that you DO NOT WANT. When you have completed that de-selection,
then click on the Finish button. The install process will validate
you selections to determine if you've accidentally unchecked any
prerequisites and ask if you wish to install them. Obviously, say yes
and continue.

Upon completion you will have what you are calling a "minimal" system.

But in the long run, its only what is loaded and running in memory
that makes a difference. With today's HDD capacity, even if its
loaded on the disk but isn't activated, no harm done but its always
available if you need it or want to play with it.

Good luck,

Bob
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [SLE] Can a native 64-bit CPU run 32-bit code ?
    ... In the following I'm copying my supervisor's suggestion based on a ... previous experience they had at trying to install MARS (A Mongte Carlo ... But it appears you mistakenly attribute your MARS problem with SuSE ... 32 bit libraries, they need those libraries available in a 64 bit ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: SuSE compatibility problems
    ... It only runs on Redhat. ... Run it on SuSE and you get Glibc ... Did you install the 32-bit or the 64-bit version of SuSE? ... 32-bit support libraries and is only finding the 32-bit versions... ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: appllix 5.0 on suse 9.0
    ... > and libc libraries. ... Those rpms installed on suse 8.2 with no problem. ... The libc.so and libm.so Shared C Libraries ... install time ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Using Suse packages in Redhat Advanced server
    ... > libraries) on my Redhat AS 2.1 installation? ... In theory you would end up with a SuSe system again, ... For each "library" that you install ... from the SuSe system, you will loose the default RedHat library, your Redhat ...
    (linux.redhat.install)
  • Re: Using Suse packages in Redhat Advanced server
    ... > libraries) on my Redhat AS 2.1 installation? ... In theory you would end up with a SuSe system again, ... For each "library" that you install ... from the SuSe system, you will loose the default RedHat library, your Redhat ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)