Re: SUSE 10.1 review.
- From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:28:54 +0100
__/ [ Dirk Roos ] on Friday 12 May 2006 19:06 \__
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ houghi ] on Friday 12 May 2006 17:15 \__Hm, I'm (also) looking for a good reason to go for 10.1, but this "review"
10.1 is a solid release, and with reviews like this turning out around
the net it might be time to update.
I read it and saw nothing that would makes a Joe Sixpack upgrade.
Especially not from 10.0.
Joe Sixpack does not upgrade. Joe Sixpack goes to the shop and gets a new
box from an OEM. The key is in getting such positive reviews and compel
manufacturer to deliver SuSE out of the box.
as you call it hasn't given me a single argument to do so.
Calling it a review is giving way too much credit to the author. You might
call it a blog-entry, but a "review"? : haha ;-)
The following (far less amateur) review has just hit the Digg.com front page:
I hope you find it informative enough to form a better opinion and have
better judgment for making a final decision.
Roy S. Schestowitz | "In hell, treason is the work of angels"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
2:25pm up 15 days 21:22, 12 users, load average: 0.69, 0.73, 0.72
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
- Prev by Date: suse 10 prism wlan pcmcia card (YOU)
- Next by Date: Re: Error on dl'ed Suse 10.1
- Previous by thread: Re: SUSE 10.1 review.
- Next by thread: Re: SUSE 10.1 review.