Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- From: David W Studeman <eat_your_own_spam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:15:16 -0700
darklight wrote:
AnonymousFC4
Yast is somewhat broken
Minor: many requiring manual intervention
remove zen and in stall smart that worked for me
but smart does take the fun out of installing packages
That sounds reasonable to me, after some upgrades, the zen programs (those
hideous gtk2 apps that MUST have come from the Ximian monkees) quit working
anyway. I'll try smart now.
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- From: Harold Stevens
- Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- References:
- Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- From: AnonymousFC4
- Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- From: darklight
- Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- Prev by Date: Re: zen-updater stalled
- Next by Date: Re: dual boot 10.1 install on WIndows machine
- Previous by thread: Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- Next by thread: Re: Suse 10.1 vs Suse 10.0 : good, but not as good!
- Index(es):