Re: Suse 10.1
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:47:18 +0200
blackcat wrote:
But as it was released, 10.1 could be a pain to fix on some hardware. Novell
has supplied the right updates relatively fast. And now 10.2 is on its way,
correcting the weaknesses of early 10.1. But now that my 10.1 is working
fine (even if it seems slower than previous 10.0), I will not rush to the
next upgrade.
1) You make it sound as if 10.2 is a result of the issues with 10.1.
That is not so. 10.2 was planned and is on sceme with releases. Once
10.2 comes out (begin 2007) 10.3 will be on its way. Development never
stops. The moment 10.1 came out, the development for 10.2 was underway.
If anything, 10.2 will have a delay, because of the tiome spend on 10.1
problem solving instead of 10.2 development.
2) Not rushing an upgrade is something that you ALWAYS should consider.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I most likley will stick with 10.0 as
it does what I want it to do. I have no reason to upgrade to 10.1.
--
houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
.
Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suse 10.1
- From: blackcat
- Re: Suse 10.1
- References:
- Suse 10.1
- From: rac
- Re: Suse 10.1
- From: Clive
- Re: Suse 10.1
- From: blackcat
- Suse 10.1
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for old SuSE Linux 6.0 iso files
- Next by Date: Re: Cymotion keyboard on Suse10 x86 64
- Previous by thread: Re: Suse 10.1
- Next by thread: Re: Suse 10.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
