Re: shell Hell

AfAIK wrote:

voyager informed me that Bar wrote:

nurax wrote:

Il Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:37:45 +0000, Bar ha scritto:

I choose ext2, not reiser. (Why
reiser?)

Why ext2?

Lowest overhead.

Fastest general purpose filesystem.

Greatest HD yield.
and ist dead beyond recover on almost every third crash. ;)

Not my experience at all and I have had years of experience with ext2 on
servers and workstations.

Further, the system in question is a relatively new laptop with a good
battery.

I don't know about you SuSE guys but Slackware doesn't experience that many
hard crashes that aren't power or hardware related. The further fact is
trying to recover data from a failed Reiser filesystem can be a nightmare
if not impossible.

i stick to reiser.

Do as you wish but why not ext3?

I will take stability everytime over a shiny feature list every time.

Bar
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: shell Hell
    ... Fastest general purpose filesystem. ... Greatest HD yield. ... i stick to reiser. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Changing from reiserfs to ext2 (...or what else?)
    ... When I installed suse 9.1 I noticed that it suggested me reiserfs for ... the / partition, and ext2 for the /var partition. ... I thought "reiser is newer, and if it suggests it for / it is good" ... Reading some articles on internet I found that ext2 still has the ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Fstab and JFS
    ... You mount JFS just like ext2, ext3 or reiser. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: USB Ladekabel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr_Akkus?=
    ... 15 Min. fsck mit ext2, daher -> Reiser, dann ... Datenverlust -> ext3. ...
    (de.sci.electronics)
  • Re: [opensuse] Goodbye to suse
    ... My experience with ext2 has been maddening to say the least. ... OTOH, i've never lost anything with reiser, crash, power fail, or kernel ... The stated reasons for suse switching away from reiser had nothing to do ... John Andersen ...
    (SuSE)