Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- From: pack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Daniel Packman)
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:31:59 -0500
In article <etqv04-7r4.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
houghi <reply.to.server@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robert Kopp wrote:
I have a 10.0 installation and am thinking about upgrading to 10.1.
Why? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I still mainly use 10.0 and it
does what it must do.
Upgrades are often driven by lack of patches for a given version.
Once patches are no longer available for a particular version, you
*must* upgrade. Other reasons to upgrade might include a particular
feature, service support, software compatibility, new hardware support,
software parity with another platform....etc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- From: houghi
- Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- References:
- Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- From: Robert Kopp
- Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- From: houghi
- Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- Prev by Date: Re: ftp/firewall problems
- Next by Date: Installing Java
- Previous by thread: Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- Next by thread: Re: Upgrading to 10.1 from 10.0 (IA32)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
