Re: First looks at a de-branded openSUSE based distibution

On Saturday 02 December 2006 08:48, Arun Khan <knura@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
alt.os.linux.suse:

David Bolt wrote:

The first task was to build source
[snip]
It appears that you took the binary rpms

Where do you get that idea from the above quote?

--
Robert HULL

Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net
is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SUSE Linux 10.1 release date
    ... contradict me by repeating *EXACTLY WHAT I WROTE* ... Robert HULL ... Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net ... is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: SUSE Linux 10.1 release date
    ... Robert HULL ... Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net ... is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Acrobat plugin
    ... On Sat, 04 Mar 2006, Robert Hull wrote: ... Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net ... is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act ...
    (uk.comp.os.linux)
  • Re: NTP SYNCHRONISATION PROBLEM - SUSE 10.1
    ... We are not deaf. ... Robert HULL ... Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net ... is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Setting default DNS Server?
    ... though there is a DNS server running locally? ... Robert HULL ... Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net ... is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act ...
    (alt.os.linux)