Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: ben chang <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:54:11 GMT
If you have both 10.1 and 10.2 it makes sence to use the latest one.
10.1 will be outdated 8 months earlier then 10.2. That means that people
will have 8 months less pleasure of their OS before they are confronted
to update.
Why would you NOT want to run the latest when you are going to install a
new version anyway? When you said you were going to offer 10.1 and 10.2
I asumed that they do not have anything installed.
Why would somebody go for 10.1 (or earlier versions) when 10.2 is
available. The moment 10.3 comes out, I would be sugesting 10.3 _for a
new installation_. Obviously when you have SUSE installed as always "If
it ain't broke, don't fix it"
houghi
unless you got burned by the catastrophic first release attempt of 10.1.
that's a case where waiting a few months gets you the 'remastered' release
which works great, but installing the freshest release gets you gnashing
of teeth.
hurts to say it but it's kind of like apple hardware. maybe more
appropriate to say - 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but wait 3 to 6
months to make sure it actually ain't broke before you try to install it'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: houghi
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- References:
- Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: Per Inge Oestmoen
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: houghi
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: Chris Maaskant
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: Chris Maaskant
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: Per Inge Oestmoen
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: houghi
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: Per Inge Oestmoen
- Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- From: houghi
- Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- Prev by Date: Re: flash video (flv) converter software?
- Next by Date: Re: INstalling 10.2 over 10.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- Next by thread: Re: Bad fonts in opensuse 10.2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|