Re: SuSe 10.2 and PostFix setup
- From: One 6699 <one6699@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:01:55 +0000
On 2007-01-24 22:15:12 +0000, David Bolt <blacklist-me@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, One 6699 <one6699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:-
This is for example the relay bounced mail (I maked the user name).
Please reply to <Postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Remember this address, because I think you're going to need it.
if you feel this message to be in error.
The original message has been removed from the bounce message.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mtaout02-winn.ispmail.private.ntl.com
This is the one that passed the bounce back to you.
Arrival-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:28:16 +0000
Received-From-MTA: dns; aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (22.214.171.124)
And this is the server that tried to send the message
To someone @hants.gov.uk
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <user@xxxxxxxxxxxx>^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Remote-MTA: dns; mail5.band-x.net (126.96.36.199)
By sending it to a mail server here.
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 <user@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: Relay access denied
Which then, quite rightly, said I'm not a relay so don't try relaying
this mail through me.
Now, what would be interesting is why the server at 188.8.131.52
tried to use 184.108.40.206 as a relay when the listed MX records for
davjam@davids:~> dig hants.gov.uk mx
; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> hants.gov.uk mx
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63355
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;hants.gov.uk. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
hants.gov.uk. 86400 IN MX 10 mx01.hants.gov.uk.
hants.gov.uk. 86400 IN MX 10 mx02.hants.gov.uk.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
mx01.hants.gov.uk. 86400 IN A 220.127.116.11
mx02.hants.gov.uk. 86400 IN A 18.104.22.168
 Doesn't exactly inspire confidence in their abilities when they
can't get even the DNS sorted out properly. That server identified
itself as aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com, which doesn't actually
resolve, and has a rDNS of host81-103-221-35.not-set-yet.ntli.net.
Thanks David very much for your analysis of the problem. I'm glad it's not a problem with my postfix setup.
Thanks - Tom
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux installation on drives other than IDE?
- Next by Date: kde 3.5.6 repository?
- Previous by thread: Re: SuSe 10.2 and PostFix setup
- Next by thread: Elementary question