Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:26:35 +0100
John Bowling wrote:
I have heard about people installing it with much less. Sounds to meI am in the middle of a new 10.2 install on a system with onboard video
that the onboard video card was not recognised.
houghi
and 32M allocated to it. With 256M ram it refused to install unless it
had a swap partition. Adding another 256M worked.
Could be that people either used the text based installation, swap or
both.
houghi
--
They say pesticides have been linked to low sperm counts.
In my opinion if you have bugs down there that are so bad
you need to use a pesticide, you're not gonna get laid anyway.
.
- References:
- A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: cat
- Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: houghi
- Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: Jim Jones
- Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: houghi
- Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- From: John Bowling
- A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- Prev by Date: Trash can problems
- Next by Date: 10.2 update mirrors listing
- Previous by thread: Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- Next by thread: Re: A few questions about 10.2 and/or VMWare 5.x and/or MS Virtual PC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|