German magazine)of April 2007 is an advertise after page 6: London Stock
Exchange chooses Windows server (Windows Server 2003) i.s.o Linux due to
reliability.
The previous system was based on old HP hardware and HP-UX. The new system
has been build from scratch with new hardware. All the comparisions in the
microsoft article are made between the old and the new system, no linux.
I couldn't find any news article on "heise.de" (c't magazine online)
covering your news. Could you supply it?
Windows XP Slow File Copy Performance ... files or single large files to Windows Server 2003 or a Linux NAS device.... This slowness occurs on our local LAN as well as our WAN.... We use QOS on our WAN for our VOIP phones, ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
Re: Windows 2003 server and Linux ... >> only thing that we are using the Windows server for are Policies ... >> they have linux machines that use SAMBA server. ... >> unreliable) then the remote sites can't connect to their local linux... (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
Re: Fedora the right choice? ... >easily get this going on a windows server which is what I do for a living. ... >But in an effort to force myself to learn and get more experience with Linux... I am assuming if I install this OS minus the GUI... (Fedora)
Re: Id rather wait a year for a superior product! ... > to Oracle Rdb and thus even for Oracle Classic it was missing heavy ... There are four reasons for the shift: Linux has hit technological ...Windows Server; and it enjoys the support of Oracle and IBM. ...cost of ownership because of the high cost of Linux administrators; ... (comp.os.vms)
