Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: "Pat Kelecy" <pkelecy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 15:27:33 -0400
"houghi" <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnf4u178.gp7.houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pat Kelecy wrote:
I thought Linux was fairly immune to viruses, malware, and other exploits
(which, as I understand it, are mainly targeted at MS software). So is
this
really that necessary, particularly for a home user? If not, can it be
uninstalled without causing other problems?
I don't use it. As I have never used it, I have no idea what the
advantages might be if you do. To me my firewall is good enough.
Those are my thoughts also (about the firewall, that is). I just wanted to
make sure removing it wouldn't break something else (wasn't sure how tightly
it's integrated with the OS). But now that I think about it, Yast probably
wouldn't let me if it was really that critical.
-Pat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Baron
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- References:
- Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Pat Kelecy
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: houghi
- Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|