Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Peter Bradley <p.bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 22:48:51 +0100
Ysgrifennodd Baron:
Peter
I am using SuSE 10.0 at the moment and have not had any such issue
with "AppArmor" !! I thought that you were supposed to use the
examples as templates to create your own profiles......Mmm
Heh! Dunno. I'm just a thicko programmer. But I promise you I did nothing to annoy it. I know I'm a lousy admin, so I leave all this sort of stuff well alone. It still jumped up and bit me, though.
However, I got lots of help and it seems to have quietened down somewhat of late.
And please don't think I'm knocking it. I'm not really. I think Novell made a mistake including it in 10.0, before they'd got it fully sorted out. But we all make mistakes: and this one not that big a deal. If I could get it sorted (with help) then it couldn't have been all that hard.
Now I know what it is, and where to look, I don't have a problem with it.
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Baron
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- References:
- Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Pat Kelecy
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: houghi
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Pat Kelecy
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Baron
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Pat Kelecy
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Baron
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Peter Bradley
- Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- From: Baron
- Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Prev by Date: Changing the amount of RAM that is kept free
- Next by Date: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Is AppArmor really necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|