Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:20:15 +0200
ajp wrote:
A quick test using the VM seems to be Ok - have you (or anyone else) hit any
problems with this?
I have had problems with LVM in that I was unable to recover from a
chrashed system. Hard reboot and fsck did not work. I now do not use LVM
anymore. The disadvantage of having one partition with many points of
failure does not make it worthwhile for me to run LVM.
houghi
--
The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that
grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak.
-- Robert A. Heinlein in "The Man Who Sold the Moon"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: Chris Cox
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- References:
- reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: ajp
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: ajp
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: houghi
- Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- From: ajp
- reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- Prev by Date: Re: kmenuedit 10.1
- Next by Date: Re: Updating apps to most recent version
- Previous by thread: Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- Next by thread: Re: reiserfs or ext3 on lvm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|