Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:54:46 +0200
David Bolt wrote:
YaST has been under the GPL for several releases. It was under its own
license upto SuSE 9.0, and was re-licensed under the GPL in SuSE 9.1.
So, when you used SuSE 9.2, it had already been open for over 6 months.
With "closed" I do not mean closed source, I mean the specific data management, that doesn't allow to enter new packages *other* than RPM.
DoDi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: David Bolt
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: houghi
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- References:
- Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hendric Stattmann
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: David Bolt
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: David Bolt
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: houghi
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: Install from .tar.gz
- From: David Bolt
- Install from .tar.gz
- Prev by Date: Re: 10.1 vs 10.2 (Yast2)
- Next by Date: Re: 10.1 vs 10.2 (Yast2)
- Previous by thread: Re: Install from .tar.gz
- Next by thread: Re: Install from .tar.gz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|