Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: David Bolt <blacklist-me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:08:13 +0000
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Uwe Grauer wrote:-
Any arguments why type can't be used or why copy should be saver?
There may be character translation occur, which the /b option for copy
ensures won't happen. If the input files are text, and they're going to
be used in a DOS-based environment, there's no reason to no use type. If
the files aren't text, why risk it?
Regards,
David Bolt
--
www.davjam.org/lifetype/ www.distributed.net: OGR@100Mnodes, RC5-72@15Mkeys
| SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit | openSUSE 10.3 32bit
SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit |
RISC OS 3.11 | RISC OS 3.6 | TOS 4.02 | openSUSE 10.3 PPC
.
- References:
- Alternative to rar split files?
- From: Luca
- Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: Stephen Chadfield
- Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: Luca
- Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: Uwe Grauer
- Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: David Bolt
- Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- From: Uwe Grauer
- Alternative to rar split files?
- Prev by Date: Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Next by Date: Re: Can't update gimp from 2.2 to 2.4
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- Next by thread: Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- Index(es):