Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: David Bolt <blacklist-me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:59:29 +0000
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Andreas Stieger wrote:-
houghi wrote:
Andreas Stieger wrote:
nano is the GPL replacement for pico.
Not Emacs? <Ducks>
No. May I quote Thomer M. Gil:
"Emacs is a great operating system – it lacks a good editor, though."
So true.
I don't know. If I had a preference, it'd be to use Emacs over vi,
purely because I find vi to be damn annoying. Having said that, I prefer
nano to either of those two and, if I'm using a GUI, I prefer kate and
then kedit.
Regards,
David Bolt
--
www.davjam.org/lifetype/ www.distributed.net: OGR@100Mnodes, RC5-72@15Mkeys
| SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit | openSUSE 10.3 32bit
SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit |
RISC OS 3.11 | RISC OS 3.6 | TOS 4.02 | openSUSE 10.3 PPC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: houghi
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- References:
- Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Ab Pp
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Andreas Stieger
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: houghi
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Andreas Stieger
- Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Prev by Date: Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Next by Date: Re: Alternative to rar split files?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Next by thread: Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|