Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:38:45 +0100
David Bolt wrote:
I don't know. If I had a preference, it'd be to use Emacs over vi,
purely because I find vi to be damn annoying. Having said that, I prefer
nano to either of those two and, if I'm using a GUI, I prefer kate and
then kedit.
I must honestly say that I have never tried Emacs. I could never get the
hang of pine, so that is the reason I never started to use pico either.
The reason I started using vi, was because I started working on Unix
machines over telnet. Later I want(ed) to be able to ssh from work to
home, as I do now, and use the same programs.
Running putty is easy. What I do like with Kate or Kedit is that you can
have tabbed things. vim now has that as well. Yet normaly I would work
in the following manner.
http://houghi.org/shots/wmaker/slides/right_03.php
The large terminal has the code I am working on. The top left is where I
run the program and the bottom right I use for manpages, looking things
up and so on.
If I need, I have a second monitor where I can do and see stuff. So the
need for me for these tabs is very minimal and I will avoid it as much
as possible.
houghi
--
houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
.
Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...
- References:
- Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Ab Pp
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Andreas Stieger
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: houghi
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: Andreas Stieger
- Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- From: David Bolt
- Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Prev by Date: Re: bugreport = free?
- Next by Date: Re: bugreport = free?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pico on OpenSuse 10.3??
- Next by thread: 10.3 system does not shut down
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
