Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: David W Studeman <eat_your_own_spam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:16:08 -0800
Bill P wrote:
1) I have 5 beagle/IndexHelper.exe processes running - why 5? All have
STAT S N (sleep, nice) using almost 80mb ram (inc. the daemon)
2) I noticed the announcement of a 0.3.1 release and yet the Suse build
service only offers 2.18, does anyone know why there's not been a upgrade
made available? Isn't Suse a sponsor of Beagle?
PS - I know nobody really likes it but it is the only indexer I'm aware of
that has a kio (I can not get kio-find, used by tracker, to compile)
One would think so by the way it is shoved on us upon first login. I removed
as much Beagle crap as I could because it's such a hog and I get tired of
listening to my drive thrash constantly. I have always been happy using the
locate command to find anything in my system and the db is updated by cron
already. Add this to the growing list of solutions looking for a problem.
It was only a matter of time before Linux's increasing popularity would
spawn such awful crap as SELinux and Apparmour and now Beagle. Reminds me
of what you'd get on a Norton Utilities suite.
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Vahis
- Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Harold Stevens
- Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot compile ASC (Advanced strategic commander 2.0.1.0)
- Next by Date: Re: Suse 10.3 talks to websites while you're asleep?
- Previous by thread: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Next by thread: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
