Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Harold Stevens <wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:16:07 -0000
In <47772998$0$504$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> David W Studeman:
[Snip...]
spawn such awful crap as SELinux and Apparmour and now Beagle. Reminds me
of what you'd get on a Norton Utilities suite.
I generally agree about Beagle, but not so much SELinux and AppArmor.
IMO, Beagle's mostly about user convenience; SELinux and AppArmor are more
about system security. It's an important distinction; I appreciate vendors
offering security enhancement *options* (watch linewrap):
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/
0,289483,sid39_gci1281393,00.html
I would have appreciated Beagle as an *option* during install, but it was
irksome to find it unannounced hogging (my limited) resources afterward.
JMO; YMMV...
--
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots.
Really, it's (wyrd) at airmail, dotted with net. DO NOT SPAM IT.
Kids jumping ship? Looking to hire an old-school type? Email me.
.
- References:
- 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Bill P
- Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: David W Studeman
- 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Prev by Date: Re: Three monitors
- Next by Date: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Next by thread: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|