Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Vahis <waxborg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:04:25 GMT
On 2007-12-30, David W Studeman <eat_your_own_spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill P wrote:
1) I have 5 beagle/IndexHelper.exe processes running - why 5? All have
STAT S N (sleep, nice) using almost 80mb ram (inc. the daemon)
2) I noticed the announcement of a 0.3.1 release and yet the Suse build
service only offers 2.18, does anyone know why there's not been a upgrade
made available? Isn't Suse a sponsor of Beagle?
PS - I know nobody really likes it but it is the only indexer I'm aware of
that has a kio (I can not get kio-find, used by tracker, to compile)
One would think so by the way it is shoved on us upon first login. I removed
as much Beagle crap as I could because it's such a hog and I get tired of
listening to my drive thrash constantly.
I'm constantly wondering these experiences with Beagle/Kerry.
I have the beagle daemon running and Kerry (KDE) finds anything in
seconds.
I have all my 8 (local and NFS) partitions, a bit over 1 terabyte,
indexed.
Beagled is using zero point something CPU at any given time.
Firefox for example is using 31 right now while I'm on cli typing this.
My proc is 1.500 MHz Athlon XP and I have i GB of RAM.
Vahis
--
"The only thing more expensive than training is the lack of it"
Henry Ford
.
- References:
- 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: Bill P
- Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- From: David W Studeman
- 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Prev by Date: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Next by Date: Re: dependency hell
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 Beagle q's - and surprisingly not cpu thrashing ones
- Next by thread: USB mouse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|