Re: standalone sftp server?
- From: shimp <example@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:34:55 -0700
Michael Soibelman wrote:
I was thinking the same thing regarding WINE. Try it and let us know.
Also, you should be aware there are sftp servers for Linux but they are
proprietary (a.k.a. $$$$). So if you don't mind paying do a Google search
for 'sftp for Linux"...
Upon closer examination it looks like the filezilla client supports
sftp, but not the server. The server supports only ftp and ftps. So I
think I'll just go with vsftpd. It will be more painful to get ftps
through the firewall, and my users will always get a message that im not
a trusted certificate from root authority. But on the upside at least I
can have virtual users. I hate to give people system accounts just to
share files or svn.
.
- References:
- standalone sftp server?
- From: shimp
- Re: standalone sftp server?
- From: Michael Soibelman
- Re: standalone sftp server?
- From: Michael Soibelman
- Re: standalone sftp server?
- From: shimp
- Re: standalone sftp server?
- From: Michael Soibelman
- standalone sftp server?
- Prev by Date: Re: Routing questions
- Next by Date: Re: Why doesn't double-clicking a window's control-box close it anymore?
- Previous by thread: Re: standalone sftp server?
- Next by thread: cdcover?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|