Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:38:28 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
But without KDE 4, openSUSE 11 looks very decent to me. People who say
it's slow usually don't bother removing all the eye-candy that is there
by default. There's nothing the in the binaries that make it slow.
It's the default configuration that makes it slow, and the configuration
is up to you.
What is slow about it? I do not have the latest machine. Actualy it is
already a few years old. I have ran KDE 4 for a few hours with all the
things I could find and saw nothing that would indicate to methat it is
slow.
houghi
--
Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done,
and why. Then do it.
-- Heinlein : Time Enough For Love
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- From: Nikos Chantziaras
- Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- References:
- moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- From: Boska
- Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- From: Claude Hopper
- Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- From: Nikos Chantziaras
- moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- Prev by Date: Re: Somebody still running SUSE 9.2?
- Next by Date: Comparing update systems (Was: What is the relationship between OpenSuse and SLED)
- Previous by thread: Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- Next by thread: Re: moving from 10 to 11, not so nice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|