Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: Vahis <waxborg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:46:24 GMT
On 2008-08-27, houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vahis wrote:
OK, so instead of directly putting `zypper` at boot time, you use `at
zypper` at boot time. OK, cool. Nice to know.
Obviously you should still let the shutdown still do the `zypper`
directly (and let it finish) because otherwise it might never happen.
Then maybe just:
zypper --quiet up -y -t patch
Otherwise you never get the kernel updates.
No, because when you get the kernel, you need to reboot. Not something
you want to do.
But this was done at shutdown, so there's gonna be a boot?
So again what I propose is:
1) Machines that seldom are durned off
a) just use cron
I do. +email tells me when to do interactive things, I will choose time.
2) Machines that are often turned off
a) With the boot do the update without the kernel. That way you
always have the latest version. Use the `at` to do it when
the PC is idle
b) With the shutdown do the update with the kernel. That way
if there is something, you need to reboot and that is what
you are doing anyway.
This should be made available in YaST to choose. Just like the current
"Automatic Updates"
Make a request, I'll vote.
Obviously if you have a LOT of PC's, like in an offic, you will also
have a server, so use that to do get the updates and download from
there. No need to bother the servers on the internet with 15.000
downloads at 09:00 and 17:00
The server would do it at night time on an odd minute.
Very good practice. Also the 50 or whatever PC:s should be cloned with
the aid of a disk image to start with. Or at least with AutoYaST which
I've never tried.
OTOH it could be wise to install the new kernel first next to the old
one and test it for a while before making it default and removing the
old one.
I had once (ages ago) a non booting kernel and did that for a while.
I gave it up when there was no trouble ever after.
There was an incident once and that lasted for a few hours. So people
doing the updates then AND did not pass the interactive omnes where
affected.
I was even more newbie then than now, I was in shit. I don't remember
how I solved it. Now I would know, of course :)
Maybe I'll do that again next time.
Once for I believe a 3 hour window in 10 years for something you won't
be affected by if you not install the kernels automagically is not a
real issue. I am sure I (and you)) will make more errors by overwriting
the wrong kernel.
This is because I've just changed to 64 bit (and more ram + a four cores)
and a lot is new to me, I'm suspicious :)
Then don't do automagick kernel updates.
We'll see. Right now I'm about to compile and install a module for the
onboard nic. Unless there's a better solution.
I'll start another thread about that.
--
Vahis
http://waxborg.servepics.com
Congressman Wilson has an expression:
"You can teach them to type, but you can't teach them to grow tits."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: houghi
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- References:
- My zypper dissapeared
- From: Mothra2
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: Andreas Stieger
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: houghi
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: Vahis
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: houghi
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: Vahis
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: houghi
- Re: My zypper dissapeared
- From: Vahis
- My zypper dissapeared
- Prev by Date: Upgrade problem on sled 10
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrade problem on sled 10
- Previous by thread: Re: My zypper dissapeared
- Next by thread: Re: My zypper dissapeared
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|