Re: Why I had problems
- From: houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:00:11 +0200
Mark Shroyer wrote:
Your snideness betrays your ignorance. If you define "better" in terms
of what the shell can do, and in how coherent, straightforward, and
reliable a manner it can do it, then PowerShell is unequivocally better
than traditional flat pipe-based shells. I suggest you take the time to
learn what PowerShell is, before you further embarrass yourself.
Oh no, it is much more fun for the audience this way. After all, we are
just entertainers. Otherwise we would not just say 'X is better then Y'
and then point to the other that he has no idea, but instead make valid
points and proove that you are right.
You know, with examples and such. But this way is much more fun. People
like looking at monkeys trwoing dirt.
So here we go.
Bash is the betterst of them all and PoewerShell can notv even stand in
its shadow.
houghi
--
You are about to enter another dimension, a dimension not only of
sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of
imagination. Next stop, Usenet!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: jsnover13
- Re: Why I had problems
- References:
- Why I had problems
- From: Kevin Nathan
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: houghi
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: DenverD
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: houghi
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: Mark Shroyer
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: houghi
- Re: Why I had problems
- From: Mark Shroyer
- Why I had problems
- Prev by Date: Re: acrobat reader firefox plugin
- Next by Date: Re: Why I had problems
- Previous by thread: Re: Why I had problems
- Next by thread: Re: Why I had problems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading