Re: which linux to use for a 4 year old laptop??

From: hugh jass (hugh_jass_at_obvious.moonman.com)
Date: 09/20/03

  • Next message: Ohmster: "What do I need for sound in KDE?"
    Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:34:59 -0400
    
    

    Thanks Big Daddy... I will check out SuSe!
    hj.

    -- 
    ______________________
    please remove the obvious from my email...
    "Big Daddy" <NoWay@NoBusiness.com> wrote in message
    news:3f6a742e$0$12620$a0465688@nnrp.fuse.net...
    : hugh jass wrote:
    :
    : > Hi there,
    : > My machine is a few years old.  It is a P2-266MHz with 64Mb RAM.
    : > What Linux would you recommend to put on it.  My main requirements are
    : > general office stuff and must be able to connect to router.  Also want
    to
    : > get familiar with Linux and try some GIS software (Grass) on it before I
    : > invest in a newer machine for Linux purposes.
    : > thnx, hj.
    :
    : SuSE 8.2 or better yet, the upcoming (in October) SuSE 9.0!
    :
    : I'm a Linux _user_. What I mean by that is that I'm an everyday computer
    : user that uses Linux just as if it were Windows. I don't know the ins and
    : outs of Linux at all. I can hack config files confidently, but get me into
    : the relm of doing things from the Bash prompt, and I'm clueless except for
    : simple tasks such as 'make', 'make install', 'su', etc. I've flirted with
    : Linux for quite sometime now, using Red Hat as new as 7.3, Mandrake as new
    : as 8.2, and now I use SuSE. This is my second SuSE release installed and
    : now it's my main computer - much newer Windows computer sits idle mostly.
    :
    : Red Hat wasn't bad at all. It was, however, very Gnome-centric (I prefer
    : KDE) and it lacked a lot of the software titles that come with either
    : Mandrake or SuSE. It did do one thing I liked better than the others: the
    : fonts always looked great in Red Hat 7.3. I've had mixed success with font
    : anti-aliasing in either MDK or SuSE. However, it just didn't feel
    : comfortable to me. It seemed like a system for a more seasoned user than
    : Mandrake or SuSE.
    :
    : When I started using Mandrake, I thought I found the Holy Grail of Linux.
    : However, Mandrake began asking me to join MandrakeClub for a fee and once
    : even asked all users to just send them a donation to help them with
    : short-term finance problems. I really didn't like that at all. I bought my
    : distro. I'd always test-use the download version, only to purchase the
    full
    : deal when it was released shortly afterward. I shouldn't have to send them
    : another cent! On top of that, it seemed that Mandrake was a little buggy
    : compared to Red Hat. "A little" is being kind... Then I had a problem with
    : them, trying to purchase an upgrade from them. I won't go into details,
    but
    : it ruined my taste for Mandrake Linux.
    :
    : I didn't want to go back to Red Hat, nor was I going to give another penny
    : to Mandrake. Enter SuSE. I felt more comfortable with a major distro than,
    : say, Slackware. I'm sure Slackware is a fine Linux, and SuSE was
    originally
    : based on it, so please, no flames. Anyway, I gave SuSE 8.1 Professional a
    : shot. The first time I booted it and found that there wasn't a single
    piece
    : of hardware other than my nVidia card to configure, I fell in love. Then I
    : ran YaST... All my administration needs in one simple to use package.
    Then,
    : I updated with YOU (YaST Online Update). It even updated KDE for me! (I
    : don't think it does that anymore except for security updates and such)
    This
    : was bliss... I've never regretted my jump to SuSE. I wish I'd found out
    how
    : great it was before Mandrake ever got a single dollar from me.
    :
    : Trust me, SuSE is absolutely the way to go. However, I know that Mandrake
    : has a fine, very usable system and so does Red Hat. Both have made
    advances
    : since I used them. Mandrake now has a very YaST-like administration setup.
    : You really won't be disappointed in any of them, really. However, I do
    : conclude that SuSE is much better than either from a non-power user
    : standpoint.
    :
    

  • Next message: Ohmster: "What do I need for sound in KDE?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Newbie trying out Linux
      ... you get what you pay for with SuSE. ... financial health and Mandrake just got out of bankruptcy proceedings. ... a lot of my problem was that I just didn't know much about Linux ... developers by paying for our distro. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: SuSE and Mandriva (Was: Adsense Gadget)
      ... You can always go back to YaST and install whatever you fancy. ... from the list I just incompletely approximated and let Mandrake install ... I didn't say I was afraid of SuSE. ... And since Linux understands MS file ...
      (alt.html)
    • Re: which linux to use for a 4 year old laptop??
      ... > get familiar with Linux and try some GIS software on it before I ... Linux for quite sometime now, using Red Hat as new as 7.3, Mandrake as new ... and now I use SuSE. ... Red Hat wasn't bad at all. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: [SLE] Redhat vs SuSE Debate
      ... Fedora Linux is the equivalent of Red Hat Linux, ... > always been targeted at small customers with lower support needs. ... >> considering SuSE. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
      ... David probably meant IBM pSeries/p5) and Itanium Linux installations ... Leading Itanium vendors, i.e. HP, Fujitsu and SGI officially support ... Red Hat and SUSE as OS options for their hardware. ...
      (comp.arch)