Re: freesco good at protection ?
From: Dazz (cashdj_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/02/03
- Next message: Chomsky is a Dickhead: "Re: OSNews - Run by a retard"
- Previous message: Dazz: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- In reply to: Skybuck Flying: "freesco good at protection ?"
- Next in thread: Skybuck Flying: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- Reply: Skybuck Flying: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:23:39 +1000
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 22:16:19 +0100, "Skybuck Flying"
<nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Since the atlantic cable broke and my zone alarm pro firewall went down...
>and also increased cable modem activity I dont feel safe anymore behind my
>windows xp + zone alarm pro firewall. Especially since real hackers by pass
>such firewalls with shim's etc.
>
>So I am looking for a stronger protection against bad people ;)
>
>Is freesco a good choice to put between my windows xp pc and my cable modem
>?
>
>Is it any good at protection... or is there something else which is stronger
>?
>
>I still want to connect to the net ofcourse... ;)
>
>Even disconnecting might not be safe from viruses lol.
>
>Anyway I have an extra pentium 166 mhz with 32 mb ram which should be quite
>enough for freesco...
I used to use Freesco a few years back, and I never had any problems
with it.
Just make sure you're using the latest version - Version 0.3.2.
Simple to use and even simpler to setup.
Dazz
- Next message: Chomsky is a Dickhead: "Re: OSNews - Run by a retard"
- Previous message: Dazz: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- In reply to: Skybuck Flying: "freesco good at protection ?"
- Next in thread: Skybuck Flying: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- Reply: Skybuck Flying: "Re: freesco good at protection ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
