Re: SCO to go after Google?

From: Keith Clark (clarkphotography_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/03/03


Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 09:25:56 -0800


Bill Unruh wrote:

> chris@nospam.com writes:
>
> ]On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:31:57 GMT, Robert Newson
> ]<ReapNewsT@uk.co.fsnet.bullet3> wrote:
>
> ]>Steve Schreiber wrote:
> ]>
> ]>> AlanS wrote:
> ]>>
> ]>>> http://www.codefish.net.au/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=488
> ]>>>
> ]>>> Just when you thought that SCO couldn't get any more obnoxious.
> ]>>>
> ]>>> AlanS
> ]>>>
> ]>> I find that pretty interesting considering Microsoft is getting ramped
> ]>> up to launch their own search engine. Smelling more and more like a
> ]>> valid conspiracy theory to me.
> ]>I find it interesting that google fails to sell out to M$ and then this SCO suit pops up.
>
> ]Revenge is just as plausible. Google groups was recently used to dig
> ]up evidence that SCO knowingly contributed to Linux code (which
> ]conflicts with their response to IBM).
>
> ]http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031130210334574
>
> ]I figured SCO would start picking on little guys who couldn't afford
> ]to fight their lawyers. Once a few little guys rollover or lose, SCO
> ]can start claiming precedent and get the fear factor up.
>
> I think Google can probably hire more lawyers then SCO can.

I would hope so since they're owned by Nestle now. ;->

--Keith